EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 6 / No 2 (Décembre 2014) Educ Ther Patient/Ther Patient Educ, 6 2 (2014) 20201 References
Free Access
Issue
Educ Ther Patient/Ther Patient Educ
Volume 6, Number 2, Décembre 2014
Article Number 20201
Number of page(s) 10
Section Mises au point/Updates
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/tpe/2014011
Published online 20 November 2014
  1. Dumez H. Faire une revue de littérature : pourquoi et comment? Le Libellio d’Aegis 2011; 7(2):15–27. [Google Scholar]
  2. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar : strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 2008; 22:338–342. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM, Anderson P. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews : a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2013; 2 :115. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kelly L, Pierre-Hansen NS. So many databases, such little clarity: searching the literature for the topic aboriginal. Can Fam Physician 2008; 54:1572–1573.e5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. U.S. National Library of Medicine. MEDLINE, PubMed, and PMC (PubMed Central) : How are they different? [en ligne]. 5 février 2014 [consulté le 05/09/2014]. Disponible sur : http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/dif_med_pub.html. [Google Scholar]
  6. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Question : How many PubMed® searches are performed? [FAQ : PubMed®; en ligne]. 24 december 2013 [consulté le 06/03/2014]. Disponible sur : http://www.nlm.nih.gov/services/pubmed_searches.html. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoogendam A, Stalenhoef AF, Robbé PF, Overbeke AJP. Analysis of queries sent to PubMed at the point of care : Observation of search behaviour in a medical teaching hospital. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8:42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boutin F. Medline 2.0 : les alternatives à PubMed [en ligne]. Journée d’étude de l’ADBS «santé 2.0», Lyon; 29 mars 2012 [consulté le 28/04/2014]. Disponible sur : http://fr.slideshare.net/ADBS/medline-20-les-alternatives-pubmed. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zheng M-H, Zhang X, Ye Q, Chen Y-P. Searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic review. Stroke 2008; 39(8):e139. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deccache A, Lavendhomme E. Information et éducation du patient : Des fondements aux méthodes. Bruxelles : De Boeck, 1989. 240 p. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lagger G. Efficacité de l’éducation thérapeutique. Revue Médicale Suisse 2009; 196(12):688–690. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dufour J-C, Mancini J, Fieschi M. Recherche de données factuelles. J Chir (Paris) 2009; 146:355–367. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eveillard P. L’interrogation à la « Google ». Rev Prat 2012; 62:216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Colson S, Gentile S, Côté J, Lagouanelle-Simeoni M-C. Spécificités pédiatriques du concept d’éducation thérapeutique du patient : analyse de la littérature de 1998 à 2012. Santé Publique 2014; 26:283–295. [Google Scholar]
  15. Herskovic JR, Tanaka LY, Hersh W, Bernstam EV. A day in the life of PubMed : analysis of a typical day’s query log. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14:212–220. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. INSERM. Le MeSH bilingue anglais – français [Site Internet]. [consulté le 25/07/2014]. Disponible sur : http://mesh.inserm.fr/mesh/presentation.htm. [Google Scholar]
  17. U.S. National Library of Medicine. As an author, how should I select keywords so that my article will appear in MEDLINE? [FAQ about indexing for MEDLINE; en ligne]. 24 juillet 2014 [consulté le 05/09/2014]. Disponible sur : http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/indexfaq.html{#}keywords. [Google Scholar]
  18. Eveillard P, Hannedouche T. Recherche bibliographique médicale avec Medline–Pubmed. Une approche pratique basée sur l’exemple. Néphrol The 2007; 3:475–485. [Google Scholar]
  19. U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed Citation Status [en ligne]. 21 janvier 2014 [consulté le 05/09/14]. Disponible sur : http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/pm_cit_status.html. [Google Scholar]
  20. Volpato ESN, Betini M, El Dib R. Testing search strategies for systematic reviews in the Medline literature database through PubMed. J Eval Clin Pract 2014; 20:117–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Millard T, Elliott J, Girdler S. Self-management education programs for people living with HIV/AIDS : a systematic review. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2013; 27:103–113. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Walger O. Self-management education, éducation du patient et chronic disease management : une réflexion sur les termes employés en Suisse. Educ Ther Patient/Ther Patient Educ 2013; 5(2):401–408. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Albano MG, Giraudet-Le Quintrec JS, Crozet C, ’Ivernois (d’) J.-F. Characteristics and development of therapeutic patient education in rheumatoid arthritis : Analysis of the 2003-2008 literature. Joint Bone Spine 2010; 77:405–410. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Albano MG, Golay A, De Andrade V, Crozet C, Ivernois (d’) J.-F. Therapeutic patient education in obesity : analysis of the 2005-2010 literature. Educ Ther Patient/Ther Patient Educ 2012; 4(2):S101–S110. [Google Scholar]
  25. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Patient education as topic [en ligne]. 2014 [consulté le 07/03/2014]. Disponible sur : http://www.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/mesh/2014/MB_cgi?field=uid{&}term=D010353. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ivernois (d’) J-F, Gagnayre R. Apprendre à éduquer le patient : approche pédagogique. Paris : Maloine, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  27. Macedo-Rouet M, Rouet J-F, Ros C, Vibert N. How do scientists select articles in the PubMed database? An empirical study of criteria and strategies. Eur Rev Appl Psychol 2012; 62(2):63–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bouchard A, URFIST de Paris. Evolution des moteurs de recherche sur internet [en ligne]. 15 :45 :33 UTC [cité 3 avr 2014]. Disponible sur : http://fr.slideshare.net/URFISTParis/evolution-des-moteurs-de-recherche-sur-internet. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sayyah Ensan L, Faghankhani M, Javanbakht A, Ahmadi S-F, Baradaran HR. To compare PubMed Clinical Queries and UpToDate in teaching information mastery to clinical residents : a crossover randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2011; 6:e23487. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Keepanasseril A, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Net improvement of correct answers to therapy questions after pubmed searches : Pre/Post Comparison. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15(11) :e243. Cité par : Eveillard P. PubMed : les clinical queries en perdition [en ligne]. Consulté le 08/04/2014 [publié le 13/12/2013]. Disponible sur : http://docedu.fr/WordPress/archives/1081. [Google Scholar]
  31. Agoritsas T, Merglen A, Courvoisier DS, Combescure C, Garin N, Perrier A, et al. Sensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14(3):e85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li J, Lu Z. Developing topic-specific search filters for PubMed with click-through data. Methods Inf Med 2013; 52:395–402. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.